Tuesday, 28 April 2026

Is information something that is stored and transmitted? — The reification of relational differentiation into transferable substance

Few concepts travel as easily between disciplines as this one. We speak of storing information, transmitting it, encoding and decoding it—as if information were a kind of thing that moves from place to place. From this arises a familiar question: is information something that is stored and transmitted?

“Is information something that is stored and transmitted?” appears to ask whether information exists as a substance-like entity that can be contained, moved, and transferred between systems.

But this framing depends on a prior move: treating patterns of relational differentiation—differences that make a difference within constrained systems—as if they were objects capable of being packaged and transported.

Once that move is examined, the question no longer concerns the mechanics of a hidden substance. It reveals a familiar distortion: the reification of relational differentiation into transferable content.


1. The surface form of the question

“Is information something that is stored and transmitted?”

In its everyday and technical form, this asks:

  • whether information exists independently of its medium
  • whether it can be encoded, stored, and retrieved
  • whether communication involves transfer of information
  • whether information is a kind of entity

It presupposes:

  • that information is a thing
  • that it can exist apart from its instantiation
  • that storage involves containment
  • that transmission involves movement

2. Hidden ontological commitments

For the question to stabilise, several assumptions must already be in place:

  • that differentiation can be abstracted into a substance
  • that patterns can be detached from the systems that instantiate them
  • that communication is transfer rather than coordination
  • that encoding preserves an entity across media
  • that information is independent of interpretation

These assumptions convert relational patterning into portable content.


3. Stratal misalignment

Within relational ontology, the distortion involves substance reification, detachment projection, and transfer modelling.

(a) Reification of information

Information is treated as a thing.

  • instead of a relational distinction
  • it becomes an entity that can exist and move

(b) Projection of detachment

Patterns are treated as separable.

  • information is assumed to exist independently of systems
  • rather than arising within them

(c) Transfer modelling

Communication is framed as movement.

  • information is said to travel from sender to receiver
  • rather than being co-actualised across systems

4. Relational re-description

If we remain within relational ontology, information is not something that is stored and transmitted. It is a relational differentiation that is stabilised, re-instantiated, and coordinated across systems under constraint.

More precisely:

  • systems instantiate structured relations under constraint
  • within these systems, differences are generated that affect possible configurations
  • these differences can be stabilised in physical media (e.g. states, patterns)
  • what is called “storage” is the maintenance of such differentiations within a system
  • what is called “transmission” is the reconstruction of corresponding differentiations across coupled systems

From this perspective:

  • nothing is transferred as a substance
  • no entity called “information” moves
  • instead, patterns are re-instantiated under coordinated constraints

Thus:

  • information is not contained
  • it is enacted as relational difference within systems

5. Dissolution of the problem-space

Once substance and transfer are no longer projected, the question “Is information something that is stored and transmitted?” loses its structure.

It depends on:

  • treating information as an entity
  • assuming detachment from instantiation
  • modelling communication as transfer
  • equating pattern preservation with movement

If these assumptions are withdrawn, there is nothing to store or send.

What disappears is not information, but the idea that it exists as a thing.


6. Residual attraction

The persistence of the question is entirely understandable.

It is sustained by:

  • technological practices (files, signals, data transfer)
  • language of encoding and decoding
  • the apparent independence of content from medium
  • successful replication across systems

Most importantly, stability feels like transport:

  • a message appears in one place, then another
  • this suggests something has moved between them

This experiential pattern encourages reification.


Closing remark

“Is information something that is stored and transmitted?” appears to ask whether information is a transferable entity.

Under relational analysis, it reveals something more precise:
a reification of relational differentiation, combined with a projection of detachment and a transfer model of communication.

Once these moves are undone, the substance dissolves.

What remains is information as relation:
the structured differentiation of systems under constraint—stabilised, coordinated, and re-instantiated, but never stored or transmitted as a thing.

No comments:

Post a Comment