The Universal Complementarity of Construal: 7 Manifesto for a Repositioned Knowledge

This series has traced a single structural insight to its widest implications:

• The cline of instantiation is continuous, structured, and reversible.

• Complementarity is universal: every construal is simultaneously instance and system.

• The metalevel is directional, not ontological.

• Hierarchy is an enduring illusion.

• Theory is an act of positioning, not elevation.

• Data and theory are duals, phenomenon and metaphenomenon are reversibly linked, law and event are mutually readable.

The insight is simple in statement, radical in consequence: knowledge is always perspectival, structured, and relational.

---

1. Reframing the Project of Knowledge

From this vantage, the aim of theorising is not to ascend, discover absolutes, or claim foundational authority. It is to:

• Identify relational positions along structured potential.

• Stabilise patterns as directional constraints.

• Navigate the reversibility of instance and system.

• Cultivate clarity and rigor within the relational field.

The goal is positional mastery, not metaphysical elevation.

---

2. Implications Across Domains

Science: Observation is theory-laden; laws are actualised patterns, not metaphysical peaks. Theorising is stance, not hierarchy.

Semiotics: Texts are simultaneously phenomena and subpotentials; meaning is both actualisation and constraining potential. Patterns emerge as both instance and system.

Ontology: Reality is not stratified by “most real” levels. Structured potential actualises relationally. Complementarity is the ontological grammar.

In every case, knowledge is not vertical; it is clinal. Authority is relational, rigor is directional, and complementarity is structural.

---

3. Why This Matters

Conventional epistemology imagines knowledge as climbing a ladder:

• Data → Pattern → Theory → Metalevel.

Universal complementarity dissolves the ladder. The climb was never ontological. Directional positioning replaces vertical ascent. Hierarchy is replaced by relational leverage.

This is not relativism. Constraints remain real. Actualisations remain structured. What changes is where authority is located and how it is recognised.

---

4. Practices of a Complementary Knowledge

1. Explicit positioning: Every theorist must declare their directional stance along the cline.

2. Reversibility awareness: Any claim may be read from another direction; embrace dual legibility.

3. Relational rigor: Evaluate clarity, consistency, and relational coherence, not metaphysical altitude.

4. Cross-domain resonance: Recognise that the structural grammar of construal applies to language, science, mathematics, and ontology alike.

Knowledge becomes navigation, not conquest.

---

5. A Manifesto

• There is no absolute metalevel.

• There is no privileged hierarchy.

• Theory is not above data.

• Observation is never neutral.

• All patterns are dual: instance and system.

• Complementarity is structural, universal, and reversible.

To theorise is to take position with awareness.

To analyse is to read patterns relationally.

To know is to navigate the cline of instantiation with clarity and precision.

---

6. Forward-Looking

This framework opens new avenues:

• Pedagogy: Teach positioning, not hierarchy; cultivate awareness of directional leverage.

• Research: Explore the relational grammar of construal across domains.

• Theory-building: Focus on relational consistency, reversibility, and complementarity.

• Ontology: Understand reality as relational, structured, and perspectival.

We leave behind the illusion of vertical ascent. We step into a world where knowledge is a cline, every vantage is provisional, and every act of construal is a responsible positioning within structured potential.

This is universal complementarity realised.

This is the grammar of knowledge, of language, and of reality itself.