Across the series — When Physicists Talk About Reality, Relational Cuts in Modern Physics, A Theory of Theoretical Pathology, The Ontology of Explanation, From Model to World: The Vanishing of the Cut, Why Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics Never Converge, and String Theory as a Limit Case — a single structural diagnosis comes into focus.
What appears, on the surface, as a collection of domain‑specific problems is revealed as a family of related failures in how theories relate to phenomena.
1. The Central Diagnostic: The Missing Cut
At the heart of every series lies the same structural absence: the failure to maintain a cut between theory and instance.
When this cut is maintained, theories function as structured spaces of possibility — intelligible precisely because they are not the world. When it collapses, models, formalisms, and symbolic systems begin to masquerade as reality itself.
This is not a local error. It is a generative condition for entire research programmes.
2. Surrogates for Instantiation
Across domains, the loss of instantiation produces compensatory mechanisms:
Aesthetic criteria (beauty, elegance, naturalness)
Mathematical coherence and internal consistency
Interpretative narratives layered atop underdetermined formalisms
Predictive rhetoric detached from event‑anticipation
These surrogates do not fail accidentally. They succeed structurally — sustaining legitimacy, coordination, and authority in the absence of phenomena.
3. Stable Disagreement and Interpretative Proliferation
Where formalism is underdetermined relative to phenomena, disagreement does not converge.
Interpretations proliferate not because participants are confused, but because each reparcels the same unconstrained object differently. Empirical equivalence stabilises disagreement. Critique fails to land because there is nothing, structurally, for it to dislodge.
This dynamic is clearest in quantum mechanics, but it generalises widely.
4. From Explanation to Derivation
As the cut vanishes, explanation quietly collapses into derivation.
What once aimed to make phenomena intelligible becomes an exercise in formal manipulation. Intelligibility is preserved symbolically, even as contact with the world thins. The appearance of explanation remains, while its relational grounding disappears.
5. Theoretical Pathology as a Systemic Condition
The resulting pathologies are not correctable from within the system that produces them:
More data does not restore instantiation.
More mathematics does not recover phenomena.
Better instruments do not repair a missing cut.
Pathological theories are not wrong in the ordinary sense. They are structurally self‑maintaining.
6. String Theory as the Limit Case
String theory makes these dynamics visible in extreme form:
Mathematics functions as a surrogate world.
Internal elegance sustains authority.
Phenomena are indefinitely deferred.
It is not an aberration, but a clarifying magnification of patterns present elsewhere.
7. What This Work Does — and Does Not — Offer
These series do not propose new interpretations, new theories, or methodological recipes.
They offer something quieter and more demanding:
A way of seeing when theory has lost its world.
A vocabulary for diagnosing structural failure without polemic.
An ontology that appears not as doctrine, but as a condition of possibility for non‑pathological theory.
The aim is not reform, but intelligibility.
And in making these structures visible, the work clears conceptual space — without pretending to fill it.
No comments:
Post a Comment