If possibility is dynamic rather than given, then novelty is not an interruption of order but its consequence. This claim runs against a deeply entrenched intuition: that constraints restrict creativity, that sedimentation ossifies systems, and that novelty must arrive from outside the structures that precede it. In fact, the opposite is the case. Constraint and sedimentation are the very mechanisms by which novelty becomes possible at all.
To see this, we must abandon the image of novelty as eruption and replace it with a relational account of emergence.
1. Why Novelty Requires Constraint
A system without constraint cannot generate novelty, because it cannot generate difference that matters. Without constraints, everything is equally possible — and therefore nothing is intelligible. There are no trajectories, no affordances, no distinctions capable of persistence.
Constraints do not specify outcomes; they shape the space in which variation can occur. They define which differences count, which transformations are coherent, and which continuities can be maintained. In doing so, they create a structured field in which novelty can emerge as recognisable deviation, rather than as noise.
Novelty is not the absence of constraint. It is variation within constraint.
2. Sedimentation as Generative Memory
Sedimentation is often mistaken for mere accumulation — a piling up of past forms that weighs down the present. But sedimentation is better understood as generative memory: the stabilisation of relational achievements that become resources for further articulation.
When a pattern sediments, it does not close off possibility. It reconfigures the field of possibility, making some trajectories easier, others harder, and still others newly visible. Sedimented structures act as attractors, scaffolds, and reference points — not as fixed endpoints.
Crucially, sedimentation does not preserve outcomes; it preserves conditions of intelligibility. What persists is not a form, but a way of making further variation meaningful.
3. Novelty as Reconfiguration, Not Invention
From this perspective, novelty is not the invention of something wholly new, nor the importation of form from elsewhere. It is the reconfiguration of existing constraints and sedimented patterns into new relational alignments.
Every genuine novelty rearranges what was already available — but in doing so, it changes what will be available next. The system’s history is not erased; it is reworked. Possibility evolves because each successful articulation subtly reshapes the constraints that govern subsequent articulations.
This is why novelty is neither predictable nor arbitrary. It is conditioned without being determined.
4. Stability and Change Are Not Opposites
Constraint and sedimentation are often positioned as the enemies of change. But this opposition collapses once we see that stability is what allows change to register.
Stability provides the background against which deviation becomes visible. Sedimented structures anchor the system, allowing variation to occur without dissolution. Change is not a rupture from stability; it is stability doing new work.
5. The Evolution of Possibility
Taken together, constraint and sedimentation explain how the field of possibility evolves. Each new articulation both relies on and modifies existing structures. Over time, this produces a shifting landscape in which new pathways open, old ones narrow, and unexpected alignments emerge.
The evolution of possibility is therefore neither linear nor cumulative. It is topological: the shape of the space itself changes as the system continues to articulate within it.
Conclusion
Novelty is not the enemy of constraint, nor the escape from sedimentation. It is their joint achievement. Constraint makes difference intelligible; sedimentation makes difference durable. Together, they generate a system capable of genuine innovation without abandoning coherence.
In the next post, we will turn to cuts — the perspectival operations that actively reconfigure this evolving landscape of possibility, shaping not only what emerges, but what can emerge next.
No comments:
Post a Comment