Friday, 2 January 2026

Resistance and Reconfiguration: 1 Mapping the Field: Seeing the Invisible Architecture

1. The Prerequisite for Reconfiguration

No field can be re-aligned without first being understood.

Cognitive fields are invisible:

  • they guide what is noticed and ignored

  • they structure attention and salience

  • they stabilise participation without overt rules

Attempting change without mapping the field is guesswork, not strategy.

Reconfiguration begins with diagnosis, not persuasion.


2. Field Elements to Identify

A field can be mapped by identifying its structural components:

  1. Attention Flows – What captures notice? What is backgrounded?

  2. Salience Structures – What is treated as urgent, normal, or trivial?

  3. Affordances – What actions feel possible, easy, or natural?

  4. Constraints – Which options are cognitively costly or impossible?

  5. Stabilisers – Symbols, routines, metrics, infrastructures, and temporal rhythms that preserve the field.

These elements exist relationally, not in isolation; they define how participation emerges.


3. Mapping Methods Without Interference

Mapping does not require persuasion or altering beliefs:

  • Observation: Track attention patterns and response rhythms.

  • Trace Interactions: Identify recurring sequences of participation.

  • Audit Symbols and Routines: Note which symbols, metrics, or procedures anchor behaviour.

  • Identify Breakpoints: Look for areas where friction or confusion naturally arises.

The goal is structural understanding, not correction.


4. Patterns, Not Individuals

Mapping must focus on fields, not minds:

  • Individuals are effects of the field, not sources of its stability.

  • Alignment, compliance, or misalignment occurs along structural trajectories.

  • Understanding the field reveals why cognition follows particular paths without needing to “convince” anyone.


5. Visualisation and Abstraction

Fields can be conceptualised using abstract models:

  • Nodes = salience points

  • Pathways = attention flows

  • Constraints = high-friction zones

  • Anchors = stabilising routines or symbols

These models are diagnostic tools, not prescriptions. They reveal where intervention is possible.


6. The Analytic Shift

This is the essential inversion:

  • Traditional resistance targets minds.

  • Field-based reconfiguration targets structural relations that shape cognition.

  • Strategy is not persuasion; it is alignment, friction, and affordance management.

Mapping the field is the foundation for all subsequent reconfiguration. Without it, any attempt at change is fragile, transient, or accidental.


7. What Comes Next

With the field mapped, the next post examines Points of Fragility: Where Fields Can Shift:

  • Breakdown, misalignment, and vulnerabilities

  • Opportunities for small interventions to cascade

  • Differentiating robust stabilisation from weak spots

No comments:

Post a Comment