Genres operate as meta-readiness frameworks, allowing participants to anticipate, align, and coordinate potential in ways that are widely understood without invoking semantic meaning. Importantly, they also structure social micro-coordination: by specifying patterns of escalation and release, genres create conditions for different collective formations or “tribes” to emerge.
Consider rock music as an example:
Punk rock: high tempo, abrupt escalation, minimal resolution → bodies primed for short, intense bursts of alignment (e.g., mosh pits, close-knit circles).
Progressive rock: long-form structures, slow builds, unexpected modulations → bodies coordinate over extended time, fostering attentiveness and sustained collective engagement.
Hard rock / metal: predictable but heavy escalation → allows synchronised energy release on a larger scale, often in ritualised forms such as headbanging or circle pits.
Each sub-genre, then, functions as a social grammar of readiness, creating conditions that predispose bodies to particular forms of coordination. Readiness remains non-semiotic, but the social effects are profound: genres aggregate bodies selectively, shaping micro-collective organisation through musical affordances rather than meaning.
Post-AI, genres remain relevant as frameworks that allow machine-generated music to align human bodies with synthetic readiness patterns, preserving familiar coordination tendencies even when origin is no longer human. In this way, genres bridge the human and technological orchestration of readiness, maintaining the social scaffolding that music has long enabled.
No comments:
Post a Comment