Classical mechanics introduces momentum as a quantity of motion: the product of mass and velocity. Conservation laws and collision rules follow naturally. In the Newtonian frame, momentum is an intrinsic property of objects, a substance-like feature that is exchanged or preserved.
In the relational ontology, momentum cannot be a substance, because nothing intrinsic “travels” or “accumulates” in that sense. Motion is not displacement, velocity is not a vector, and acceleration is not a force-induced change. The classical picture of momentum is entirely representational.
Yet the phenomena captured by momentum—predictable outcomes in collisions, transfers, and collective patterning—remain fully observable. Relational ontology preserves their explanatory power, but reframes momentum as tension across successive cuts of relational potentiality.
1. Momentum as Consistency of Patterning
Momentum emerges where relational patterns persist under modulation:
-
When a system maintains coherence of actualisations despite perturbations, it manifests stable tension.
-
When systems interact, what classical physics interprets as momentum transfer is actually mutual reconfiguration of potentiality horizons, producing new patterns of coherent ordering.
Thus:
-
Momentum ≠ substance carried by an object.
-
Momentum = the relational measure of pattern consistency across successive actualisations.
This reconceptualisation explains why momentum is conserved: consistent patterns persist unless the relational horizon is fundamentally restructured.
2. Collisions as Reconfigurations of Relational Fields
Classical mechanics interprets collisions as exchanges of momentum. Relationally, collisions are interactions in which potentiality fields of two systems reconfigure each other, producing new coherent patterns.
Key observations:
-
Patterns that were stable for each system may destabilise upon interaction.
-
New stable patterns emerge from the combined constraints of the interacting systems.
-
What is construed as “momentum transfer” is simply the alignment of emergent patterning under a new relational field.
No mass, no vector, no force is “exchanged.” Only the structure of relational potentiality shifts, producing observable continuity of pattern.
3. Tension Across Cuts
The term “tension” captures the essential relational character:
-
Momentum is a measure of how strongly a pattern resists modulation across cuts.
-
Higher momentum corresponds to more coherent, stable patterning that is less easily perturbed by interactions.
-
Lower momentum corresponds to less stable patterning, more readily altered by reconfigurations.
Viewed this way, the conservation of momentum is natural: a highly coherent pattern cannot vanish without the relational field itself being altered; interactions merely redistribute coherence according to the emergent relational constraints.
4. Relational Explanation of Classical Phenomena
This reconceptualisation fully reproduces classical results:
-
Collisions: Outcomes follow naturally from pattern coherence rules.
-
Elastic and inelastic interactions: Differences in emergent rhythm stability explain observed energy distribution.
-
Center of mass motion: Emergent patterning across system interactions reproduces classical trajectory behaviour without invoking intrinsic mass properties.
The difference is profound: the ontology is relational, not representational. No hidden quantities or substances are needed; the explanatory content arises entirely from pattern stability, modulation, and tension across cuts.
5. Momentum in the Broader Relational Framework
With this post, the relational rewrite of classical dynamics is complete:
-
Motion = pattern of successive actualisations.
-
Velocity = stability of that pattern (relational rhythm).
-
Acceleration = modulation of the underlying potentiality field.
-
Momentum = tension of pattern coherence across cuts.
The framework preserves predictive power, reproduces classical intuitions where they work, and eliminates all metaphysical baggage of intrinsic motion, forces, or substances.
It also provides a foundation for integrating these ideas with broader relational phenomena:
-
Geodesics describe global trajectories as emergent stability.
-
Dynamics, as here, describes local patterning and its modulation.
-
Relational light and other forthcoming series can draw on this local dynamics as the substrate for emergent behaviour.
6. Closing Thoughts
Momentum, once a seemingly intractable substance of motion, is revealed as a relationally construed measure of pattern consistency. By focusing on tension across cuts, relational ontology dissolves Newtonian metaphysics while retaining full explanatory capacity.
This concludes the Relational Motion series. Together with the geodesics framework, it provides a complete relational replacement for classical kinematics, fully grounded in perspectival actualisation and system-relative potentiality.
The natural next step is to extend relational thinking to phenomena that depend on patterns at the limit of potentiality itself: light, frequency, and the emergent behaviour of electromagnetic phenomena. This is the domain of the forthcoming Relational Light series.
No comments:
Post a Comment