In which wavefunction and spacetime, inclination and ability, endogenous and exogenous potential, become two coordinated aspects of a single readiness field — without collapse, contradiction, or compromise.
1. The Problem Everyone Inherits
Modern physics lives on a knife-edge between two incompatible pictures of potential:
-
Quantum theory gives us a wavefunction or quantum field — a highly articulated internal potential, rich in endogenous inclination.
-
Relativity gives us a spacetime metric and curvature — a field of external constraints shaping how events can actualise.
Historically, these are taken to be different kinds of structures living in different ontological registers.
Our readiness framework collapses this divide without forcing homogenisation.
2. The Key Insight: Two Faces of One Readiness Field
In our framework, “readiness” has two sides:
-
Inclination — endogenous pressure, internal coherence, self-driven potential.
-
Ability — exogenous constraint, external coherence, ambient conditioning of potential.
This makes the division between quantum and relativity look almost embarrassingly artificial:
-
Quantum theory = the endogenous face of readiness(internal morphism-pressure of a system)
-
Relativity = the exogenous face of readiness(the ability-structure governing which morphisms are coherent in a global field)
These are not two substances; they are two directions of structure in the same relational potential.
Once seen, it cannot be unseen.
3. Reinterpreting the Wavefunction
The wavefunction (or quantum field) now becomes:
The system’s internal inclination structure — its profile of endogenous morphism-pressure.
-
Superposition = multiple viable inclinations coexisting as potential morphisms.
-
Amplitudes = intensities of inclination.
-
Phase relations = structural coherence within the inclination network.
-
Unitary evolution = stable propagation of this internal structure.
4. Reinterpreting the Relativistic Field
Conversely, spacetime curvature and the metric profile are:
the exogenous ability-conditions imposed on all systems — the global coherence rules for morphism selection.
-
Curvature = deformation in external constraints.
-
Lorentz structure = invariants of the ability-field.
-
Geodesics = minimal interference pathways through the ability-structure.
-
Stress–energy = intensities of inclination that co-determine ability conditions.
Quantum and relativistic potentials differ only in orientation, not in kind.
5. The Cut That Unifies Them: Actualisation as Joint Constraint
An event — in relational ontology — is always a cut through potential.
But that potential has two sides:
-
what the system is inclined to do
-
what the world allows to be coherently done
Thus:
Actualisation = the intersection of endogenous inclination and exogenous ability.
This gives us a relational analogue of the Born rule without probabilities and without measurement mystique:
The actualised morphism is the one simultaneously supported by internal readiness and not prohibited by external readiness.
Quantum “measurement” is simply the name physics gives to moments where the two readiness fields intersect sharply enough for a determinate cut to form.
There is no classical/quantum divide — only interactions between inclination-structures and ability-structures.
6. Why This Solves the Old Tensions
⚪ (1) No collapse problem
Collapse was always an artefact of treating the wavefunction representationally.
If the wavefunction = inclination structure, then:
-
when constraints shift (via coupling to an ability-field),
-
the structure of viable morphisms also shifts,
-
and one morphism becomes actualised.
No collapse; just cut-selection.
⚪ (2) No measurement problem
The “measurement device” is simply an exogenous ability-structure with enormous coherence.
Its ability-constraints dominate the intersection, forcing a stable cut.
⚪ (3) No incompatibility between quantum locality and relativistic locality
They govern different aspects of readiness and do not clash.
Superluminal signalling is impossible because:
-
inclination structures propagate unitarily with internal invariants,
-
ability structures forbid any morphism that violates Lorentz-consistent coherence.
Nothing spooky is needed.
⚪ (4) No need for a background spacetime
7. Category Theory as the Integration Tool
This is where the category-theoretic architecture shows its power.
-
Quantum inclination = an internal category structured by its morphisms of possible evolution.
-
Relativistic ability = a functorial external category imposing constraints on the internal one.
-
Actualisation = a natural transformation between the structured potentials, selecting viable morphisms.
This turns the quantum–relativity relation into:
A categorical coupling between endogenous and exogenous readiness.
8. Final Synthesis: One Potential, Two Faces, One Cut
We can now summarise in a single stroke:
-
Quantum theory = how a system leans
-
Relativity = how the world lets it move
-
Category theory = how both readiness structures are organised
-
Relational ontology = what a cut is and how an event is actualised
Everything fits because everything is relational potential.
Once readiness becomes the central concept, the unity is immediate.
No comments:
Post a Comment