The same Senior Common Room. A discreet decanter. Rain at the windows. Blottisham has returned, armed with conviction.
Blottisham (with renewed certainty):
I have reflected. And I still maintain that democracy is the purest expression of collective will. The people choose. The system responds. It is the very opposite of management.
Quillibrace (mildly):
Ah. We have reached the word.
Elowen:
Management?
Quillibrace:
Indeed. Mr Blottisham, would you describe for us what happens between “the people choose” and “the system responds”?
Blottisham (impatiently):
Elections. Representation. Policy formation. Implementation. The usual machinery.
Quillibrace:
Machinery. An instructive term.
Blottisham:
It’s a metaphor.
Quillibrace:
All the better.
Elowen (leaning forward):
What if the machinery is not merely executing will, but shaping it?
Blottisham:
Shaping it? Preposterous. People know what they want.
Quillibrace:
Do they know it before they are told what the options are?
(A small silence.)
Blottisham:
The options are offered by parties, naturally.
Quillibrace:
Offered. Curated. Framed. Structured. Filtered.
Elowen:
And funded.
Blottisham (bristling):
Are you suggesting the electorate is manipulated?
Quillibrace:
Not manipulated. That would imply resistance. I am suggesting something far more elegant.
Elowen (softly):
Management.
I. The Population as Administrative Object
Quillibrace:
Consider the modern state. It counts. It measures. It models. It forecasts. It classifies.
It does not merely respond to a citizenry. It maintains a population.
Blottisham:
That is simply governance.
Quillibrace:
Precisely.
Elowen:
What is the difference?
Quillibrace:
A citizen is a bearer of agency.
A population is a statistical aggregate.
Blottisham:
You’re splitting hairs.
Quillibrace:
On the contrary. I am distinguishing metaphysics.
(Blottisham frowns at the suggestion that metaphysics has intruded.)
Quillibrace:
In a democracy, citizens are told they rule. Yet every meaningful instrument of governance operates on populations — not persons.
Budgets are allocated by demographic profile.
Policies are modelled on behavioural projections.
Public communication is A/B tested.
Risk is actuarially distributed.
The individual is rhetorically sovereign but administratively negligible.
Elowen:
So the sovereign is symbolic.
Quillibrace:
Quite.
II. Consent as Stabiliser
Blottisham (firmly):
But we consent. That is the key distinction. We choose the managers.
Quillibrace:
And what, precisely, are you choosing?
Blottisham:
A direction.
Elowen:
Or a brand?
(Blottisham looks pained.)
Quillibrace:
Modern democracies do not suppress dissent by force — not ordinarily. They stabilise it through periodic rituals of participation.
Voting does not disrupt the system.
It renews it.
Blottisham:
You make it sound sinister.
Quillibrace:
Not sinister. Structural.
Elowen:
Is it possible that democracy is less the rule of the people than the management of their expectations?
(Blottisham opens his mouth. Closes it.)
III. The Elegant Trick
Quillibrace (with delicate amusement):
The genius of managed democracy lies in this:
The population experiences itself as agent
while functioning as variable.
Blottisham:
That is… rhetorical flourish.
Quillibrace:
It is administrative design.
Elowen:
So outrage becomes data.
Opinion becomes polling input.
Discontent becomes messaging strategy.
Quillibrace:
Exactly. Nothing need be suppressed if everything can be absorbed.
(Blottisham stares into the decanter as though it might yield reassurance.)
IV. The Comfort of Belief
Blottisham (quietly defensive):
Surely you are not claiming democracy is a façade.
Quillibrace:
Not a façade. A frame.
Elowen:
A frame that shapes what can appear inside it.
Quillibrace:
The naïve belief in democracy’s undoubted good is itself part of the stabilising structure. It produces trust. Trust reduces volatility. Reduced volatility lowers the cost of governance.
Blottisham:
Now you sound like a banker.
Quillibrace:
Governance is risk management at scale.
V. The Question That Lingers
(Rain intensifies. Elowen looks thoughtful.)
Elowen:
If we are managed, is there any genuine agency left?
Quillibrace:
Agency is not abolished. It is channelled.
Blottisham (quickly):
Exactly! Channelled through institutions. That is civilisation.
Quillibrace:
Civilisation, yes.
But do not confuse channel with source.
(A pause. Even Blottisham senses that something has shifted.)
Elowen:
So democracy may be good.
But not in the way we think.
Quillibrace:
That is always the interesting possibility.
No comments:
Post a Comment