As the series concludes, it is valuable to look back on the conceptual journey, highlighting each post with a concise abstract to frame the series as a cohesive retrospective.
Post 1: When Mathematics Breaks: Relational Ontology and the Limits of Measurement
This opening post inverts the familiar question: mathematical breakdown does not signal the absence of relation, but the failure of particular relational construals to stabilise. Mathematics is not a universal lens, but a disciplined method operating under specific conditions.
Post 2: What Mathematics Presupposes About Stability
Stability is the first hidden condition mathematics requires. It is not stasis, but the capacity for relations to be held steady across cuts and construals. Without this, mathematical objects cannot emerge and formal operations cannot proceed reliably.
Post 3: What Mathematics Presupposes About Separability
Stability alone is insufficient. Mathematics also presupposes separability: the ability to individuate relata so that relations can be decomposed and independently varied. When co-constitution dominates, formal description becomes impossible, revealing the fragility of mathematical assumptions.
Post 4: What Mathematics Presupposes About Invariance
Invariance is the core of mathematical power: relations must persist unchanged under admissible transformations. Where transformation alters the very constitution of what is considered an entity or relation, mathematics loses purchase, exposing the limits of structural formalisation.
Post 5: The Space of the Mathematically Possible
The joint constraints of stability, separability, and invariance define a conceptual space in which mathematics can succeed. Within this space, formalism flourishes; outside it, relational richness persists but resists capture. This explains the discontinuous and contingent nature of mathematical success.
Post 6 (Capstone): Relation vs Structure: Remainder, Meaning, and Local Success
The series culminates in the distinction between relation and structure. Structure is the disciplined rendering of relation that mathematics can formalise. Remainder—relational aspects that resist structuring—remains meaningful and intelligible. Mathematical success is local, contingent, and perspectival; limits signal the boundary between formal capture and the ongoing, dynamic becoming of relation.
Retrospective Summary
The series collectively reframes mathematical breakdown as a lens into relational reality. Stability, separability, and invariance are presuppositions, not guarantees. Relation is primary; structure is its perspectival achievement. Mathematics is extraordinary in its domain, but the richness of relational becoming extends beyond formal capture. Understanding these distinctions allows us to appreciate both the power and the boundaries of mathematics without mistaking either for the totality of relational reality.
No comments:
Post a Comment