With the cut—never an event, always a perspective—something becomes available.
Not a world yet. Not objects, laws, or explanations. And not symbols.
What becomes available is the phenomenon.
This word is often burdened with philosophical history, but here it names something more elementary and more demanding: construed experience itself. The appearance of something as something, without appeal to language, representation, or interpretation layered on top.
If possibility without form names what precedes all orientation, and the cut names the differentiation through which orientation becomes possible, then phenomenon names what it is like for that differentiation to hold.
No Raw Given
It is tempting, at this point, to imagine phenomena as raw material: uninterpreted sensory data waiting to be organised by cognition, language, or culture.
That temptation must be resisted.
There is no raw given.
A phenomenon is not what appears before meaning arrives. It is meaning in its first order. To experience something at all is already to have it appear within a perspective, structured by the cut that renders it salient rather than recessive, foreground rather than background.
This does not mean that phenomena are conceptual, linguistic, or symbolic. It means that meaning does not begin where symbols begin.
Meaning begins where experience is possible at all.
Construal as Constitutive
To call a phenomenon “construed” is not to suggest an active subject manipulating passive material.
Construal here names a relation, not an act. It is the way possibility is held such that something can appear in a particular way. There is no phenomenon independent of this holding, and no holding without something appearing.
Subject and object do not stand on opposite sides of this relation. They crystallise within it, as stabilisations that will later be mistaken for origins.
At this level, there is no observer encountering an observed. There is only the phenomenon as a unit of appearance: experience already shaped, but not yet symbolised.
Meaning Before Language
Because meaning is already present at the level of phenomenon, language does not introduce meaning into an otherwise mute world.
Language reorganises meaning.
It cuts again, at a different stratum, introducing new kinds of stability and new kinds of closure. Symbols make meanings portable, repeatable, and shareable—but they do so by abstracting from the specificity of phenomenal construal.
This is why symbolisation is both powerful and dangerous.
Powerful, because it allows worlds to be coordinated across individuals and across time.
Dangerous, because it invites us to forget that symbolic meaning depends on a prior order of meaning that it does not exhaust.
Meaning Is Not Value
A further distinction must be held carefully here.
Meaning, as it is being used in this series, is not the same as value. To say that a phenomenon is meaningful is not to say that it is good, adaptive, desirable, or selected for. Those are matters of coordination, regulation, and survival.
Value systems operate by constraining behaviour. Meaning operates by making experience available.
The two interact constantly, and are often tightly coupled, but they are not the same thing. To conflate them is to reduce meaning to function, or to mystify function as meaning.
At the level of phenomenon, meaning is neither evaluative nor normative. It simply is: the way something appears within a held possibility.
Why Phenomena Matter
If phenomena are already meaningful, then the world is never encountered as a neutral substrate upon which significance is later imposed.
This has consequences.
It means that explanation does not begin from zero. It begins from a field already thick with appearance.
It means that disagreement is not merely a clash of interpretations applied to a shared given, but often a divergence in how possibility has been cut such that different phenomena are available in the first place.
And it means that reopening possibility will never be achieved solely by changing our theories or symbols. It requires attention to the level at which experience itself is being held.
From Phenomenon to World
Phenomena do not yet make a world.
A world requires stability: repetition, regularity, and the coordination of multiple cuts such that what appears does so reliably and predictably. That stability will be the subject of the next post.
For now, it is enough to see that the phenomenon is the hinge.
It is where possibility first takes on shape without yet hardening into law. Where meaning is present without being systematised. Where experience occurs without a world fully in place.
To attend to phenomena at this level is not to retreat into subjectivity, nor to deny reality.
It is to recognise that reality is always already meaningful—long before it is explained, measured, or named.
No comments:
Post a Comment