Humans often approach meaning as if it were a machine to be designed, a puzzle to be solved, or a resource to be optimised. In mathematics and logic, this approach succeeds: formulas compute, proofs resolve, and models predict. Yet the human experience of meaning stubbornly resists such engineering.
Meaning as Relational Emergence
Meaning is not a property of symbols, statements, or objects in isolation. It emerges relationally: through patterns of interaction, interpretation, and construal that span contexts, time, and perspectives. Efforts to impose meaning from above, to encode it systematically, overlook the essential role of relational dynamics.
A formally correct statement may fail to resonate, a perfectly logical explanation may leave us unmoved. Meaning does not reside in correctness or predictive power; it arises in inhabiting relations, engaging possibilities, and experiencing coherence within a lived context.
Why Engineering Fails
When we try to engineer meaning, we reduce relational richness to formal conditions. We stabilise some relations while ignoring others, truncate temporal depth, and fix interpretations prematurely. The result may be clarity, efficiency, or control—but not meaning.
The human mind detects this absence. It craves resonance, narrative, affect, and coherence across scales. Systems may succeed locally, but they cannot substitute for the emergent relational patterns that constitute meaning in human life.
Lessons from Formal Success
Paradoxically, formal success illuminates the impossibility of engineered meaning. Mathematics, logic, and formal language demonstrate that local, bounded systems can achieve astonishing power—but only within the constraints that make success possible. Outside these constraints, formal tools cannot extend significance. Meaning requires flexibility, context, and interpretive engagement that cannot be fully formalised.
Implications for Human Practice
Accepting that meaning cannot be engineered redirects attention from design to cultivation. Meaning arises not from imposition but from relational activity: storytelling, ritual, negotiation, and creativity. Human practices must foster relational fields rather than impose outcomes.
Preparing the Next Post
If meaning cannot be engineered, what structures it, sustains it, and transmits it across time and communities? The answer lies in myth. In the next post, Myth as Relational Compression, we will explore how narrative patterns compress relational complexity into forms that humans can inhabit, share, and pass on, creating durable pockets of meaning without formal imposition.
No comments:
Post a Comment