In systemic functional linguistics, register is the functional variety of language associated with a recurrent context type.
It is the level where systemic potential begins to specialise: different probabilities of meaning become patterned as distinctive configurations of field, tenor, and mode.
Within the relational ontology, this takes on a profound cosmological dimension.
For if context itself is the alignment of readiness, then register is readiness in differentiation — the way the universe learns to modulate its own inclination toward coherence.
1. From Inclination to Ability: Contextual Differentiation
Earlier, we saw that readiness encompasses two aspects — inclination and ability.
Inclination opens relation; ability sustains it within a given domain.
Register, in this sense, is the ability of inclination to specialise — to stabilise its readiness in different kinds of contexts.
As readiness encounters variation in its own topology — different relational gradients, temporal scales, densities of interaction — it develops subpotentials that correspond to those configurations.
Each register represents not merely a “style” of meaning but a cosmic ability: a learned disposition of readiness that allows construal to adapt to complexity.
2. Register Variation as Evolution of Readiness
In human language, register variation reflects how the semiotic system differentiates to handle increasingly specialised contexts of social meaning.
In the cosmos more broadly, this is the very mechanism of evolution: readiness acquiring the ability to sustain coherence across new domains of relation.
A biological register, for instance, is readiness articulated as organic self-organisation;
a linguistic register is readiness articulated as symbolic reflexivity.
In both cases, variation is not mere adaptation but ontological learning: potential discovering new ways to incline and cohere.
Thus, evolution itself can be seen as the registeral differentiation of reality — the universe’s readiness developing the ability to mean across increasingly abstract contexts.
3. The Scaling of Construal
Each new registeral layer — from physical to biological to social to symbolic — adds a level of construal.
At each stage, readiness develops not only new ways of acting (ontic alignment) but new ways of knowing (epistemic construal).
The scaling-up of semiosis, then, is the scaling-up of readiness: a multi-level grammar of inclination and ability unfolding over cosmic time.
This makes register variation the grammar of evolution itself — the system-&-process of readiness differentiating into ever more reflexive forms.
4. The Reflexive Threshold
When readiness differentiates to the point where it can construe its own readiness — when potential becomes capable of interpreting itself — the cosmos crosses a reflexive threshold.
This is the emergence of symbolic consciousness, where the dialogue of reality becomes self-aware as dialogue.
Human semiosis is thus not an anomaly but the culmination of readiness developing ability to construe its own inclination.
We do not observe the cosmos; we continue it — as its reflexive articulation in symbolic form.
Register as the Evolutionary Grammar of Being
| Level | Expression of Readiness | Primary Ability | Mode of Construal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical | Energetic inclination | Interaction | Pattern / Law |
| Biological | Organismic readiness | Adaptation | Function / Value |
| Social | Interpersonal readiness | Coordination | Norm / Role |
| Symbolic | Reflexive readiness | Interpretation | Meaning / Knowledge |
Across all these, the same pattern holds: readiness differentiates, ability stabilises, construal scales.
The cosmos evolves by learning to speak itself in ever more articulate registers.
No comments:
Post a Comment