Cosmos of Possibility: The Architecture of Becoming Series Conclusion The Becoming of Cosmos

To study possibility is to study the very unfolding of worlds. Across myth, theology, science, technology, and politics, we see that what becomes actual is never pre-given; it emerges through relational, perspectival, and co-individuated processes.

This series has shown that:

• Possibility is structured, yet never closed; horizons and frontiers constantly shift.

• Actualisation is perspectival: each instance of being emerges as a cut through potential.

• Individuals and collectives co-individuate possibility, shaping both what is realised and what remains latent.

• Symbolic, technological, and political architectures mediate, constrain, and enable actualisation, showing that possibility is always embedded within relational fields.

A relational cosmos of possibility invites us to see the world as dynamic, open, and interwoven. It is not a static arena awaiting outcomes, nor a pre-ordained plan to be deciphered. The cosmos is a living weave of potential actualised through relation, constantly generating new horizons, new multiplicities, and new singularities.

Studying possibility in this way is to engage with the becoming of worlds itself: to attend not only to what is, but to how what is comes to be. Reality is not a fixed map but an ongoing weaving; meaning, action, and being all emerge from this relational dance.

The task of understanding possibility, then, is to trace the threads of becoming, to see the patterns of relation that bring worlds into being, and to participate knowingly in the co-creation of the cosmos.