Monday, 3 November 2025

Coherence and the Continuity of Becoming: 4 Dynamics of Coherence — Breakdown, Reorganisation, and Renewal

Coherence is often mistaken for stasis: a fixed structure resisting change.

In relational ontology, coherence is dynamic: it sustains continuity precisely by enabling breakdown, reorganisation, and renewal.
It is not the absence of instability, but the field’s capacity to maintain relational readiness through perturbation.


1. Coherence as Adaptive Self-Maintenance

Every local actualisation — a molecular interaction, a communicative event, a physical transition — perturbs the field.
Gradients shift, attractors wobble, domains reconfigure.

Coherence responds not by preventing change, but by absorbing, distributing, and integrating it:

  • Local perturbations are tuned into the broader field.

  • Structural realignment preserves the ongoing offerability of readiness.

This is the adaptive self-maintenance of the field: resilience without rigidity, continuity without closure.


2. Breakdown and Reorganisation

Breakdown is not failure.
It is the opportunity for the field to reorganise — to redistribute gradients, reconfigure attractors, and restore coherence at a higher-order topology.

  • In biology, this is akin to cellular regeneration or systemic adaptation.

  • In physics, it is the relaxation of energy distributions toward new equilibria.

  • In semiotic systems, it is innovation, reinterpretation, or the emergence of new registers.

Breakdown and reorganisation are intrinsic to the dynamics of coherence: they refresh the field’s readiness and enable novel forms of offering.


3. Reflexivity and Renewal

Coherence is reflexive: the field monitors itself, adjusting inclinations and abilities to preserve offerability.
This reflexivity allows for renewal: the continuous calibration of readiness across scales, domains, and gradients.

Renewal is not imposed externally; it emerges from the internal logic of the field:

  • Maintaining relational alignment,

  • Preserving differentiated structures,

  • Allowing gradients to evolve without loss of resonance.


4. Coherence Across Domains

Differentiated domains — material, biological, semiotic — each exhibit dynamic coherence:

  • Material domains: structures flex and adapt to maintain energy flows.

  • Biological domains: organisms regulate internal processes to sustain life.

  • Semiotic domains: meaning propagates and evolves while retaining interpretive integrity.

Coherence binds these domains together: local renewals propagate, preserving global offerability without collapsing diversity.


5. Toward the Continuity of Becoming

The dynamics of coherence reveal an essential truth:
The field’s persistence is not about resisting change, but about orienting change so that readiness remains offerable.
Breakdown, reorganisation, and renewal are the mechanisms by which the world continues to afford itself to itself.

The next post will conclude the series, synthesising affordance and coherence into a unified perspective on the ongoing topology of becoming.


Next: Affordance and Coherence: The Unified Topology of Becoming

No comments:

Post a Comment