Liora stands at the edge of the forest.
From here, it appears orderly enough. Trunks rise at measured distances. Light filters through the canopy in a way that suggests pattern rather than accident. The forest offers no invitation, but it does not refuse her either.
When she steps beneath the trees, the sense of coherence loosens.
Branches cross at irregular angles. Leaves overlap, obscure, reveal. The ground is uneven, threaded with roots that seem to anticipate weight without predicting it. Nothing here is disordered, yet nothing resolves into a single form.
Liora pauses.
The forest does not change. But what counts as the forest might.
You may remain with Liora and allow one scale of attention to come forward.
Not to explain the forest.
Not to master it.
But to notice how intelligibility shifts.
Choose a stance:
Attend to local texture.
Attend to recurring pattern.
Attend to overall form.
No stance contains the others.
If you attend to local texture
The forest fragments.
Bark fills the field of attention: rough, fissured, damp in places. Moss gathers where light thins. A single leaf, torn at the edge, curls slightly inward. The world narrows to contact and proximity.
Here, there is no forest — only surfaces and resistances. Each step presents a new configuration. Roots interrupt. Twigs snap. The ground is negotiated centimetre by centimetre.
Stability, at this scale, is fleeting. What persists is not form but responsiveness. Balance is maintained not by pattern, but by continual adjustment.
From here, coherence is not something to be found. It is something enacted, moment by moment.
If you attend to recurring pattern
Repetition emerges.
Branches fork in familiar ways. Clearings recur at irregular intervals. Certain distances between trunks repeat often enough to be noticed, not often enough to be predicted.
The forest begins to show its habits.
At this scale, difference does not dissolve coherence; it produces it. Variations cluster around tendencies. No two trees are the same, yet their differences rhyme.
Here, stability appears as pattern without blueprint. The forest is neither random nor designed. It persists by allowing variation within bounds that are never explicitly stated.
From this stance, the forest is intelligible — but only as tendency, never as rule.
If you attend to overall form
The forest gathers.
Individual trees recede. What becomes visible is mass: canopy, density, edge. Light is no longer dappled; it is distributed. Paths appear where many feet have passed, though no path was marked.
From here, the forest looks stable. It occupies space. It has a shape that can be named.
Yet the details that once demanded attention are no longer present. The small negotiations vanish. The irregularities flatten into silhouette.
Coherence, at this scale, is purchased by omission.
When you are ready, allow the forest to return to its ordinary presence.
Nothing has changed.
And yet, what counted as stable has shifted.
You may enter another stance.
Or you may leave the forest without deciding which view was correct.
All were admissible.
No comments:
Post a Comment