Why “Nothing But Language” Is a Metaphysics of Thin Air
Linguistic idealism tries to be clever.
Where old-school idealism said mind creates the world,
linguistic idealism says language creates the world.
Different gloss, same evasive manoeuvre.
The story goes like this:
-
There is no world outside discourse.
-
Reality is constructed by linguistic categories.
-
To talk about anything is to constitute it.
-
Therefore, “the world” is a grammatical artefact.
It sounds radical, even rebellious.
But as soon as we ask what language itself is,
the entire position collapses—because language is not self-grounding.
It is a system realised by and dependent on deeper relational organisation.
Let’s apply relational pressure.
1. Language Cannot Be Primary Because It Is Not Self-Sufficient
Linguistic idealism treats grammar as a metaphysical engine.
But grammar is not a universe; it is a semiotic system:
-
realised by biological capacities
-
enacted through social relationality
-
constrained by value systems (not meaning systems!)
-
organised through cultural practices
-
embedded in situations (field, tenor, mode) that give semantic shape
-
and realising semantics in the Hallidayan sense
Language is not fundamental.
It is a higher-order relational articulation.
You cannot make it metaphysically prior to the very strata that realise it.
2. Stratification Is the Guaranteed Counter-Argument
Hallidayan stratification makes linguistic idealism impossible from the start.
Context → Semantics → Lexicogrammar → Phonology/graphology
Context is not language.
Semantics realises context.
Lexicogrammar realises semantics.
Everything is relational.
Nothing is foundational.
To claim “reality is nothing but language”
is to ignore the entire architecture that makes language possible.
Language does not create context.
Context is what language realises.
Linguistic idealism tries to flip the hierarchy upside down,
and the model simply does not survive the inversion.
3. Meaning Is Not Grammar; Meaning Is Construal
Linguistic idealism mistakes grammar for meaning.
But meaning arises from construal—
a perspectival actualisation of a structured potential.
Grammar is only one means of realising meaning.
And meaning is not self-sufficient either;
it is relationally constituted through:
-
attention
-
contrast
-
experiential potential
-
social coordination
-
semiotic systems
-
construal in action
The world is not “built by grammar.”
It is construed through relational organisation,
with grammar as only one articulation of that process.
4. Language Requires Bodies, Communities, Situations
To claim “there is nothing outside language”
is to erase:
-
the body that produces phonation
-
the perceptual system that regulates prosody and distinction
-
the social collectives that stabilise meaning potential
-
the interactional pressures that sustain shared semiotic systems
-
the experiential horizons that give relevance to meaning
These are not “linguistic.”
They realise language.
If you remove the relational scaffolding
in which language is situated,
the language system collapses.
The prison house of language is not a cell—
it is a mirage.
5. Language Cannot Bootstrap the World or Itself
If everything is language, we must ask:
-
What are linguistic categories realised in?
-
How are they acquired?
-
How do they change?
-
What constrains what counts as grammatical?
-
How does linguistic behaviour emerge from non-linguistic activity?
None of these can be answered within the linguistic domain itself.
Language cannot explain itself
because it is not a closed system.
It is an instantiation of relational potentials
that reach far beyond the linguistic system.
A totalising linguistic ontology kills the very conditions
that make language intelligible.
6. The Punchline: There Is No Linguistic Prison—Only Relational Fabric
Linguistic idealism promises emancipation from metaphysics
but ends up building a metaphysics out of its own shadow.
Once we track the dependencies:
Language is not the ground.
It is a cut through the ground—
a way of actualising relational potential.
The world is not trapped in grammar.
Grammar is one of the ways we traverse the world.
No comments:
Post a Comment