Monday, 19 January 2026

Scaffolding Meaning: 4 Construal Enters — From Scaffolding to Semiotic Systems

In the previous episode, we introduced semiotic scaffolding: coordination regimes that host construal without interpreting, representing, or generating meaning. Scaffolding sets the conditions, but does not instantiate the semiotic.

Episode 4 marks the ontological hinge: here, construal enters the system. Meaning does not grow out of coordination; it appears through a perspectival cut actualising phenomena. The scaffolds ensure this is possible, but the act itself is distinct and irreversible.


The Ontological Leap

Coordination stabilises patterns. Scaffolds maintain them. But meaning requires a perspectival operation:

  • Cut: A selection within the potentialities of a system

  • Actualisation: A phenomenon comes into being as a phenomenon

  • Persistence: The phenomenon is maintained long enough to interact with other phenomena

This is not a quantitative increase in complexity. It is a qualitative ontological shift: the system moves from barely functional order to symbolically interpretable order.

In short: scaffolds host, construal actualises. Without scaffolds, construal collapses; without construal, scaffolds remain mute.


Minimal Conditions for Construal

For a semiotic system to arise, three conditions must converge:

  1. Stabilised Coordination: Pre-existing value systems provide regularised patterns that can be consistently referenced.

  2. Repeatable Differentiation: The system produces distinctions that can be reliably taken up by a perspectival operation.

  3. Perspectival Cut: An agent (or system) actualises one of these distinctions as a phenomenon for itself.

Without all three, construal cannot occur:

  • Coordination alone: meaningless, operational only

  • Repeatable differentiation without cut: latent potential, inert

  • Cut without scaffold: ephemeral, non-propagating


Construal Is Not Coordination

This is the moment where many theories stumble. Even after scaffolds exist, it is tempting to conflate the act of construal with coordination:

  • Error: “The system interprets its own patterns”

  • Correction: Construal is a distinct operation. It does not reduce to regulation, feedback, or homeostasis.

Construal brings first-order meaning into the world. Coordination simply maintains the space in which this meaning can persist. These are interdependent but non-collapsible operations.


From Individual to Shared Semiotic Systems

Once construal enters, semiotic systems can interact—but only under coordinated scaffolding:

  • Individual phenomena can be aligned across agents via shared scaffolds.

  • Repetition stabilises instances for potential communication.

  • Differences in perspective are possible, but propagating meaning requires scaffolds to support persistence.

In other words, meaning becomes shareable only because scaffolds endure and constrain relational possibilities.
Without scaffolds, semiotic phenomena are isolated flashes—transient, unstable, uncommunicable.


Illustrative Example: Proto-Social Communication

Imagine a small social collective:

  • Agents move and act according to strict coordination rules (e.g., synchronising steps or distributing resources).

  • Certain patterns recur reliably—scaffolds for action.

  • An agent actualises one of these patterns as a phenomenon for itself—e.g., recognising a signal as “danger nearby.”

The act of recognition is construal, a semiotic operation.
The other agents’ actions remain coordination-based until they too apply construal.
The scaffold ensures that this semiotic act is repeatable, persistent, and potentially alignable.

From this small, fragile interaction arises the first rudiments of shared semiotic space—not guaranteed, not emergent by accumulation, but possible under precise conditions.


Implications

  • Semiotic systems are built on scaffolds but are not reducible to them.

  • Meaning is fragile: its existence is contingent on both coordination and perspectival cut.

  • Communication and social symbolic systems are possible only where reliable scaffolds and repeated construals coincide.

  • This explains why symbolic meaning is rare and valuable, yet fully grounded in relational systems.


Looking Ahead

Episode 5 will explore hybrid systems, where coordination and semiotic operations interact robustly:

  • How do scaffolds support multiple, interacting semiotic phenomena?

  • How can construals propagate and align across agents without collapsing value into meaning?

  • What patterns of entanglement produce stable semiotic systems, social communication, and shared symbolic meaning?

Episode 4 sets the ontological hinge; Episode 5 will build the architecture of hybrid semiotic systems, where scaffolds and construals co-exist dynamically.

No comments:

Post a Comment