Saturday, 22 November 2025

Patterns of Possibility: 4 Agency and Causation: Cognitive Horizons of Influence

Processes unfold, participants act, and space situates them. Now we examine how events unfold through force, control, and responsibility. Languages do not merely label cause and effect — they pattern agency relationally, shaping how speakers attend to, reason about, and narrativize influence.


1. Agent prominence and syntactic alignment

  • English: accusative; agents are default. Attention is foregrounded on who acts.

  • Dyirbal / Basque: ergative; patient/event is often central. Agents may be backgrounded.

  • Cognitive effect: habitual construal modulates attention to actors vs. events, influencing moral and causal reasoning.


2. Causative strategies

  • Turkish: morphological causatives encode direct control.

  • Japanese: analytic causatives encode indirect or relational influence.

  • Speakers are tuned to degrees of control and relational mediation, shaping prediction and understanding of event dynamics.


3. Evidentiality and epistemic modulation

  • Tibetan / Quechua: causal and evidential marking combine.

    • The speaker encodes whether causation was directly observed, inferred, or reported.

  • Cognitive payoff: habitual use of evidential marking structures attention, inference, and the epistemic weighting of participants’ influence.


4. Narrative implications

  • English: linear causal chains, hero/villain arcs.

  • Dyirbal: narratives emphasize event consequences; agents may recede.

  • Turkish / Japanese: intentionality and relational control shape plot focus.

  • Tibetan / Quechua: narratives foreground epistemic stance and causal inference.

Takeaway: Agency construal preconfigures narrative focus, moral reasoning, and relational attention.


5. Concluding Reflection

Languages pattern how influence, control, and responsibility are perceived. Habitual construal of agency:

  • Tunes attention to actors, forces, and relational dynamics

  • Structures memory of causation and outcomes

  • Shapes expectation and prediction in narrative and reasoning

  • Provides distinct cognitive and narrative horizons

Agency and causation are thus cognitive horizons of influence, shaping the perception and enactment of relational power in experience.

No comments:

Post a Comment