In our previous post, we explored differentiation of collective potentials: how structured relational lattices subdivide into semi-stable patterns under constraint. We now turn to the question of individuation. In relational ontology, individuals are not atomistic entities, but positions along a perspectival cline within collective potential.
Individuals as Relational Positions
An “individual” emerges when a cut:
-
Foregrounds certain potentials relative to the rest of the lattice.
-
Stabilises a pattern sufficiently to act as a coherent unit in subsequent relational operations.
-
Remains linked to the collective potential, maintaining continuity across the lattice.
Individuation is therefore gradual and perspectival, not absolute.
The Perspectival Cline
The cline of individuation is a spectrum:
-
At one extreme, highly integrated potentials remain collective and diffuse, with no distinct identity.
-
At the other, highly localised potentials are relationally distinct, yet never fully isolated.
-
Most “individuals” occupy intermediate positions, co-individuating with neighbours and with the collective potential.
This explains why phenomena appear both distinct and interconnected.
Stability and Coherence
Individuation is not merely an appearance; it is stabilised by relational coherence:
-
Patterns must maintain consistency across interactions to persist as individuals.
-
Instabilities or unresolved tensions manifest as emergent dynamics, such as evolution, adaptation, or conceptual revision.
-
Individuality is therefore a function of relational stabilisation, not a pre-given property.
Examples Across Domains
-
Physical: Particles, quasiparticles, and field excitations are individuated within their lattice of potential, never as isolated “things.”
-
Biological: Organisms, cells, and ecological niches are positions along a cline of collective potential, dynamically co-individuated.
-
Conceptual: Ideas, models, and theorems are individuated relative to conceptual lattices, maintaining coherence while differentiating from related patterns.
Implications
-
“Individuals” are relational constructs, intelligible only in context.
-
The cline perspective resolves the paradox of unity and diversity in emergence.
-
All subsequent dynamics, including co-individuation, evolution, and systemic feedback, rely on understanding individuation as perspectival, not atomistic.
Next Steps
In the next post, we will examine co-individuation and relational feedback, showing how individuals mutually stabilise each other within collective potentials, producing complex, adaptive, and emergent structures across scales.
No comments:
Post a Comment