Thesis: Fundamental laws are often framed as if they guide the universe toward specific outcomes, subtly importing teleological reasoning reminiscent of divine purpose.
Observation: Physicists frequently describe natural laws in terms that suggest directionality: systems “tend” toward equilibrium, symmetry “enforces” structure, constants “allow” life. Even in formal mathematics, language and explanatory narratives imply an end-directed quality.
Analysis: Conceptually, this mirrors theological teleology: laws are treated as purposeful, guiding the cosmos toward a preordained configuration. Relational processes — contingent interactions and emergent actualisations — are subordinated to an implied cosmic intent. Physics thereby embeds a residual purposefulness, cloaked in the guise of scientific law.
Implication: By framing laws teleologically, physics obscures contingency and relational emergence. Observed regularities are read as outcomes of cosmic intention rather than as patterns arising from interdependent processes. This reinforces a subtle divine shadow, shaping expectations and interpretations of phenomena.
Conclusion: A relational approach reframes laws as descriptive of emergent patterns, not as guiding intentions. Recognising teleological residue clarifies that actuality unfolds from relational dynamics, not from imposed or intrinsic purpose.
No comments:
Post a Comment