Tuesday, 4 November 2025

The Logic of Gradience: Differentiation as Ontological Form: 4 The Gradient and the Cut

Actualisation as perspectival inflection within continuous differentiation.

Gradients articulate the field of becoming, but actualisation — the emergence of events, acts, or expressions — requires a cut. Yet this cut should not be understood as a rupture imposed from outside; it is a local steepening of the gradient, a perspectival inflection within continuous differentiation. Every instantiation is a slice through the topology of readiness, but the continuity of the gradient remains, extending beyond any single event.


1. The Cut is Not a Rupture

Traditional accounts of actuality often presume a binary: potential versus realised, pre-event versus post-event. In a gradient ontology, this binary collapses:

  • The cut does not sever the field; it accentuates a slope locally.

  • Potential and actual coexist along the same continuum; actuality is a temporarily intensified gradient, not a discrete unit imposed on a flat background.

  • Every event is thus both an expression of readiness and a modulation of further potential.

In other words, the world does not “jump” into existence. It folds, inflects, and accentuates what is already inclining toward becoming.


2. Instantiation as Gradient Intensification

Actualisation can be understood as a local amplification of the gradient:

  • A steepened slope attracts relational activity, producing what we perceive as an event.

  • This intensification does not flatten or eliminate adjacent gradients; it redistributes readiness in the surrounding field.

  • Each instantiation is therefore context-sensitive, shaped by both local capacity (ability) and global disposition (inclination).

Through this lens, the distinction between “potential” and “actual” becomes a matter of degree rather than kind. Instantiation is a topological phenomenon, not a metaphysical leap.


3. The Perspectival Cut

Every cut is perspectival: it reflects the relational vantage of the system observing or enacting it.

  • In physics, a photon’s “choice” of path is a perspectival selection along energy gradients.

  • In biology, a cell’s binding event is a local actualisation within a molecular field of readiness.

  • In semiotics, a construal — a meaning, interpretation, or act of communication — is the field’s self-inflected gradient at a given moment.

The cut is thus the interface between global continuity and local actualisation: the moment where the slope is steep enough to produce a recognisable event, without violating the continuity of the underlying gradient.


4. Re-entrant Gradience

Each cut feeds back into the field that produced it:

  • Local intensification temporarily reshapes surrounding gradients.

  • These modifications alter the landscape for future instantiations.

  • The field of becoming is therefore self-modulating — its cuts generate new inclinations while preserving continuity.

Becoming is thus a reflexive process: gradients produce cuts, cuts reshape gradients, and the interplay sustains ongoing differentiation. Actuality is never a final state; it is always a re-entrant modulation of potential.


Next: Gradience and Reflexive Coherence

The final part of this series will examine how coherence itself depends on maintaining gradience. We will see that reflexive tuning — the field’s ongoing adjustment of its own slopes — preserves both stability and openness, allowing the world to remain continuously differentiating without collapsing into either rigidity or chaos.

No comments:

Post a Comment