If Part 1 traced the topology of Indra’s net — a relational field where each instance reflects and sustains the collective — Part 2 turns to the dynamics that keep this field alive. Individuation, in this view, is not a one-way actualisation of potential but a reciprocal process: each instance individuates the potential, and the potential individuates the instance in return. Meaning lives in this oscillation — the shimmering symmetry of system and instance.
1. Individuation as Mutual Definition
To call individuation “reciprocal” is to deny that the individual and the collective are separate orders of being. The potential is not a reservoir of fixed possibilities awaiting activation; it is a relational field of latent orientations that only becomes articulate through instances. Each instance, in turn, is not merely a selection from the system but a reconfiguration of its potential.
In Halliday’s model, this reciprocity is latent in the cline of instantiation. The system defines the range of options, but every instance feeds back into and reshapes that range, continually modulating the potential. A system lives through the activity of its instances, just as an ecosystem lives through the circulation of its constituent organisms.
To instantiate meaning is thus to engage in mutual individuation: the potential takes shape through the event, and the event derives its form through the potential. Neither precedes the other; both are perspectives in a single reflexive process.
2. The Metabolic Pulse of Meaning
This reciprocity is metabolic rather than mechanical. Each construal metabolises potential — not consuming it, but transforming and renewing it. The energy of meaning flows through the alternation of potential and instance: differentiation, integration, differentiation again.
Jay Lemke’s ecosocial model makes this vividly clear. In his account, meaning circulates through material, symbolic, and biological systems, linking them in an ongoing semiosis. This circulation is not external to language; it is language as a living process. Each utterance is an act of metabolic exchange: it draws on systemic potential, reshapes it through construal, and returns it to the collective as altered possibility.
When we construe, we do not merely use language; we re-individuate it. Every meaning made slightly alters what meaning can become.
3. Reflexive Symmetry and the Cut
In relational ontology, the cut — the perspectival distinction that allows something to appear as something — is not destructive but generative. To cut is to actualise relation. Yet every cut implies its complement: the field from which it was drawn reconfigures itself around the new distinction.
Reciprocal individuation thus involves a living symmetry. Each perspective individuates the whole from within, and the whole adjusts to accommodate the new perspective. This continuous readjustment is what gives the field its coherence over time — a coherence not of stability, but of self-modulating reflexivity.
If we call this process systemic metabolism, then the system’s health is measured not by fixity but by the vitality of its reciprocal individuations: its capacity to sustain diversity, resonance, and transformation.
4. Meaning as Relational Resonance
The jewel’s reflection, viewed dynamically, is a pulse of resonance between instance and potential. Each meaning event propagates through the field, shifting the relational geometry of the whole. The system’s potential evolves through its instances, not by accumulation but by the differential reverberation of every construal.
This is why meaning cannot be reduced to information. Information presumes separable units transmitted across a gap. Meaning, in contrast, is the ongoing resonance of individuation within a shared field. What matters is not what passes between entities, but how the field itself reorganises — how construal transforms the relational topology of potential.
5. The Living Symmetry as Principle of Continuity
Reciprocal individuation is the secret of continuity in a changing world. A language, a culture, an ecosocial system endures not by remaining the same, but by continually reinstituting itself through its instances. Every act of construal is both inheritance and innovation — a renewal of the field through participation.
To speak, to mean, to construe: each is an act of ecological resonance. The collective survives by learning to recognise itself anew in each individuation.
No comments:
Post a Comment