1. The Participatory Universe in Brief
Wheeler proposed that observers are not passive witnesses to a pre-existing cosmos but active participants in its actualisation. The traditional realist assumption of an independent universe dissolves: observation is not merely epistemic; it is ontologically significant. Each act of measurement or interaction is an event in which the universe takes on a specific configuration, yet this should not be read as implying that human observers confer existence onto reality. The deeper point is that phenomena and their conditions of actualisation are relationally entangled.
2. Relational Reframing
Through relational ontology, Wheeler’s participatory principle can be reformulated with precision:
-
System (structured potential): The universe is a field of relational possibilities, a theory of possible alignments, not a pre-determined collection of independent entities.
-
Instance (actualisation): Observation, measurement, or interaction is a perspectival cut — the actualisation of a particular relational potential. Each cut selects a particular alignment without implying the prior existence of a fully determinate phenomenon.
-
Participation as reflexive alignment: Observer-participancy is co-constitutive; it is not the observer conferring reality, but a reflexive reconfiguration within the relational field. Each cut simultaneously draws on and reshapes the network of potential.
Thus, Wheeler’s “participation” is a concrete illustration of perspectival actualisation: a first-order event actualising relational potential within the system-as-potential. It is not revelation, nor the unfolding of a hidden order, but a continuous re-cutting of the relational field itself.
3. Comparing Wheeler and Bohm
| Bohm | Wheeler (Relational Reading) |
|---|---|
| Implicate → explicate | System-as-potential → perspectival actualisation |
| Enfolded hidden whole | Relational field of possibilities |
| Unfolding manifests phenomena | Observation actualises potential via cuts |
| Holomovement | Reflexive alignment through participatory events |
The key difference lies in ontological priorness: Bohm retains a hidden depth — a whole enfolded in which phenomena emerge; Wheeler already situates the universe as relational potential, actualised reflexively through participatory events. No hidden substrate needs to be revealed; no pre-existing code awaits discovery. The universe is always already a field of possibility in motion, continuously re-cut through actualisation.
4. Reality as Participatory Construal
Viewed relationally, Wheeler’s insight extends the logic developed with Bohm:
“Where Bohm imagined phenomena as unfolding from an enfolded whole, Wheeler foregrounds the act of co-actualisation. Observation is not revelation; it is perspectival actualisation. The universe does not wait to be seen; it is continually re-cut within the relational field of possibility.”
Participation is thus structurally akin to a construal, not a human-centric conferral of existence. Each act of measurement, each interaction, is an instance that actualises potential — and in doing so, reflexively reshapes the system as theory of possible instances.
5. Implications
Wheeler’s participatory universe, when recast relationally, illuminates a profound truth: the cosmos and its observers are co-constituted through recursive patterns of actualisation. Reality is not “out there” waiting; it is emergent through the continuous interplay of system and instance, cut and potential, reflexively aligned.
In this light, Wheeler’s contribution is not mystical, but rigorously relational: he points toward a universe defined not by substance, but by the ever-shifting configurations of relational possibility. In relational ontology, his participatory universe becomes a model of reflexive alignment writ large — a universe continually becoming, continually actualising, continually construed.
In the end, the universe does not await observation to exist; it exists as a dynamic field of relational potential, actualised again and again through perspectival cuts. Participation is not a gift of consciousness; it is the ongoing architecture of possibility itself.
No comments:
Post a Comment