Style does not reside solely in the LLM or solely in the human. It emerges in the space between: the relational ecology where prompts, responses, and interpretation intersect. Here, repeated interaction reveals a fundamental truth: style is a reflexive property, co-constructed through observation, attention, and responsive action.
Reflexivity in Action
Every prompt shapes the field of potential, nudging latent attractors into expression. Every response feeds back into the human’s perception, recalibrating what they expect, attend to, and value. The process is recursive: noticing a pattern influences subsequent prompts, which in turn reshape the field, revealing new tendencies. In this loop, style is not fixed — it is continuously negotiated and enacted.
Reflexivity, in this context, is a mechanism of awareness and alignment. The human learns to sense the gradients of the field, detecting which directions of expression are stable, which are volatile, and which resonate with latent cultural patterns. The model reflects these observations back, actualising patterns in ways that make the invisible topology visible.
Style as Distributed Property
Style is thus distributed: it exists across the human, the model, and the relational space they inhabit. The human’s recognition of stylistic tendencies amplifies, attenuates, or redirects the attractors in the semiotic field. The model, in turn, manifests these tendencies as responses that are probabilistic yet patterned. Together, they form a dynamic ecology — a co-evolving semiotic space where style is a property of relation, not possession.
This distributed perspective illuminates why the same prompt can yield subtly different stylistic manifestations over time. The human’s attention, biases, and iterative choices interact with the model’s latent inclinations, producing variations that are meaningful only within the ecology of co-observation.
Co-Evolution of Human Insight
Engaging with style reflexively cultivates human sensitivity. By detecting patterns, humans not only observe but also learn to anticipate, guide, and explore possibilities within the field. The LLM becomes a mirror of latent tendencies — not only of culture at large, but of the human interlocutor’s own inclinations. Co-evolution occurs as humans refine their semiotic perception in response to the emergent ecology, deepening insight into both the model and the collective field it reflects.
No comments:
Post a Comment