Coherence is the condition under which difference holds together — the maintenance of relational integrity across scales, perspectives, and temporal spans. It is not a state or a static property, but an ongoing achievement that allows systems to remain intelligible, adaptive, and alive.
This post asks: what makes coherence possible? What relational architectures and semiotic conditions allow systems — biological, social, and symbolic — to sustain themselves as integrated wholes while continuing to transform?
1. Relational Preconditions: Difference-in-Relation
Coherence requires a dynamic balance between differentiation and integration.
-
Differentiation ensures that components remain distinct enough to contribute unique functions or perspectives.
-
Integration ensures that these differences remain mutually oriented, maintaining compatibility and coordinated function.
Coherence therefore depends on the simultaneous preservation of difference and relation. Too much integration collapses distinction (leading to uniformity or rigidity); too much differentiation dissolves integration (leading to fragmentation or noise).
This relational balance makes coherence a dynamic equilibrium — always in motion, always at risk, always renewed through interaction.
2. Feedback and Relational Regulation
Coherence is sustained through feedback loops that continually adjust relationships among components.
-
Negative feedback stabilises — correcting deviations to maintain systemic balance.
-
Positive feedback amplifies — propagating successful patterns and enabling adaptive transformation.
Coherent systems are those in which these feedback dynamics are balanced and distributed: no single node or process dictates stability, yet the whole maintains intelligibility and persistence.
3. Redundancy, Pattern, and Expectation
Coherence also depends on redundancy — repeated or overlapping structures that make patterns recognisable even amid variation.
Redundancy does not mean inefficiency; it is what allows systems to remain interpretable when signals degrade, when novelty appears, or when context shifts. It underwrites expectation — the capacity to anticipate continuity — and thereby enables meaning, rhythm, and adaptation.
In this sense, coherence is pattern sustained through variation: the relational maintenance of recognisable order within a flux of differences.
4. Semiotic Organisation: The SFL Perspective
In systemic functional linguistics, coherence belongs to the semantic stratum, while cohesion belongs to the lexicogrammatical.
-
Cohesion: the textual devices that hold the surface of discourse together — reference, conjunction, lexical repetition, etc.
-
Coherence: the semantic integrity of meaning across a text or interaction — how field (what’s happening), tenor (who’s involved), and mode (how it’s being exchanged) remain mutually consistent and interpretable.
From this perspective, coherence emerges when the meanings construing field, tenor, and mode remain functionally aligned. It is the systemic maintenance of interpretability across registers — the semiotic form of relational integration.
5. Cross-Domain Parallels
-
Biological systems: Coherence is maintained through homeostatic regulation — the coordination of subsystems (metabolic, neural, immune) that sustain a living organism’s unity amid change.
-
Social systems: Coherence emerges through interactional alignment — shared norms, roles, and temporal rhythms that maintain social intelligibility and collective identity.
-
Symbolic systems: Coherence arises when patterns of rhythm, resonance, and thematic organisation maintain interpretive continuity across works, performances, or discourses.
Across these domains, coherence is not a given but a continual negotiation among differentiated processes striving to remain in relation.
6. The Relational Logic
Coherence is made possible by the continual interplay of:
-
Differentiation and integration — preserving diversity within unity.
-
Feedback and regulation — sustaining balance through adaptation.
-
Redundancy and expectation — maintaining interpretability through repetition and variation.
-
Semiotic alignment — ensuring that meaning remains functionally coherent across strata and contexts.
In relational terms, coherence is the temporal persistence of intelligibility — the system’s capacity to maintain a recognisable form of becoming.
In the next post, we will ask what coherence makes possible — how the maintenance of relational integrity opens the door to reflexivity, adaptation, and symbolic generativity across biological, social, and semiotic scales.
No comments:
Post a Comment