If social formations actualise potential through reflexive alignment, culture is the persistent field in which those alignments recur, evolve, and stabilise across generations. Rituals, traditions, and habitual practices are not merely repeated behaviours; they are semiotic actualisations of collective relational potential, patterns that maintain coherence while allowing innovation and adaptation.
1. Habit as recurrent alignment
Habit is the social analogue of cellular differentiation:
-
Each act, performance, or ritual is a perspectival cut through a cultural field.
-
Recurrence arises because the relational topology of the field constrains and enables certain alignments, making some behaviours “natural” or recognisable.
-
Culture stabilises through repeated actualisation of these alignments, creating coherence without prescriptive control.
For example, seasonal festivals, culinary traditions, or greetings persist because participants align their construals to the expectations embedded in the collective field.
2. Ritual and practice as morphogenetic mechanisms
Rituals, ceremonies, and codified practices operate like morphogenetic processes in culture:
-
They guide local interactions (like cells in tissue) while preserving the integrity of the larger cultural pattern.
-
Each iteration is an actualisation of potential, reaffirming collective alignment.
-
Recurrence is structural, not instructive: the “memory” of culture resides in the relational constraints that make the form emerge coherently each time.
Thus, culture is self-reproducing, yet flexible, capable of absorbing variations without losing its identity.
3. Collective memory without storage
Traditional models of cultural memory often invoke archives or repositories. Relationally:
-
Collective memory is embodied in the relational topology itself.
-
Forms, practices, and norms recur because the field persists, not because information is stored and transmitted externally.
-
Each generation re-actualises cultural potential, maintaining continuity through alignment of construals rather than replication of content.
This perspective reframes “tradition” as semiotic morphogenesis: meaning and form emerging together, recursively, across time.
4. Innovation within cultural fields
Cultural evolution arises from perturbations of the field:
-
New ideas, practices, or interpretations are local cuts that may or may not align with the larger field.
-
Successful innovations are integrated through reflexive alignment, reshaping the topology while preserving coherence.
-
Stability and novelty coexist: cultures are dynamic morphogenetic systems, continually actualising potential while allowing adaptation.
5. Implications
Cultural morphogenesis shows that:
-
Traditions, rituals, and habits are patterns of relational alignment, not mere repetitions of past forms.
-
Collective memory is topological, not archival.
-
Social and cultural continuity emerges from semiotic actualisation, making habit, practice, and ritual the mechanisms of ongoing morphogenesis.
In the next post, “Symbolic Systems as Morphogenetic Fields,” we will explore how languages, myths, and symbolic architectures themselves function as fields of potential, actualised through reflexive alignment across generations and communities.
No comments:
Post a Comment