If the embryo offers a model of morphogenesis at the cellular level, social formations provide its analogue at the collective scale. Groups, organisations, and institutions are fields of potential actualised through reflexive alignment: each participant’s construal must cohere with local and systemic constraints for the formation to maintain stability.
No committee, board, or social network is directed entirely from above. Coherence emerges from the recursive alignment of actions, interpretations, and norms—the social equivalent of cells differentiating and tissues folding.
1. Local alignment: individuals in context
Each member of a group is like a cell in an embryo:
-
They respond to immediate relational cues (tone, gesture, rules, expectations).
-
Their actions actualise one possibility among many in the collective field.
-
Stability arises because local actualisations align with neighbouring ones, forming coherent patterns of collective behaviour.
Consider a team meeting: participants negotiate timing, tone, and contribution. No single participant dictates the conversation; alignment emerges through mutual construal, creating a coherent discussion.
2. Nested alignment: institutions as relational topologies
Institutions are higher-order topologies constraining and shaping local interactions:
-
Departments, committees, and social networks act as “tissues” of the collective, each with its own relational field.
-
Rules, protocols, and shared expectations operate as constraints on potential, not as rigid scripts.
-
Local actions are constrained by both immediate interactions and the overarching field, producing a nested, multi-scale coherence.
This explains how organisations persist, adapt, and evolve without central control: alignment across scales maintains integrity even as individual behaviours vary.
3. Stability, recurrence, and habit
Just as morphogenetic patterns recur across generations because the field persists as potential, institutions and social groups maintain recurring patterns of behaviour and practice:
-
Rituals, meetings, and standard operating procedures persist not because they are memorised but because the relational topology of the group enforces alignment.
-
Recurrence is semiotic: each actualisation interprets the field, reproducing coherent patterns without requiring stored instructions.
Habit, then, is collective morphogenesis in action: a system repeatedly actualising its own potential coherently.
4. Perturbation and flexibility
Reflexive alignment does not imply rigidity:
-
Innovations, conflicts, or disruptions introduce new perspectival cuts into the field.
-
The system can absorb, redirect, or incorporate these perturbations, leading to evolution and adaptation of social form.
-
Large-scale coherence arises not from uniformity but from the capacity of the field to align diverse local actualisations.
5. Implications for understanding social systems
Reading groups and institutions as morphogenetic systems reveals:
-
Coherence emerges without central command.
-
Stability and change coexist naturally.
-
Social “memory” and culture reside not in archives but in the persistent relational potential actualised across actions and interactions.
-
Collective morphogenesis provides a lens for understanding how possibilities become actualised, constrained, and repeated in social life.
In the next post, “Cultural Morphogenesis: Habit, Practice, and Collective Memory,” we will examine how these principles extend to culture itself—rituals, practices, and traditions—as patterns of reflexive alignment across generations.
No comments:
Post a Comment