If culture emerges through reflexive alignment of habitual practices and rituals, symbolic systems—languages, myths, and conceptual frameworks—represent fields of potential actualised semiotically across time and space. They are not static codes or containers of meaning; they are living topologies, continuously realised through acts of construal.
1. Language as a morphogenetic system
Language is more than a tool for communication:
-
Every utterance is a local actualisation of linguistic potential.
-
Grammar, lexicon, and discourse structures are constraints on potential, shaping what can be coherently expressed.
-
Recurrence is reflexive, not transmitted: patterns persist because relational topologies in the speech community enable familiar forms to emerge repeatedly.
Thus, languages evolve as semiotic morphogenetic fields, adapting without a central director, yet maintaining coherence across generations.
2. Myth and symbolic architecture
Myths, narratives, and symbolic frameworks function similarly:
-
They are patterns of relational alignment, actualised in storytelling, performance, and ritual.
-
Their recurrence is not because of literal transmission, but because each instantiation aligns with the underlying topology of collective meaning.
-
Symbolic systems persist, adapt, and evolve through semiotic actualisation, with coherence emerging from alignment rather than storage.
This reframes mythic recurrence: familiar motifs, archetypes, and structures are expressions of persistent relational potential, not reflections of an external “universal pattern.”
3. Semiotic memory and persistence
Just as in culture:
-
Memory of a symbolic system resides not in texts, recordings, or codified rules, but in the topology of relational potential.
-
Each instantiation interprets and actualises this potential, reproducing coherent forms while allowing novelty.
-
Semiotic fields are self-actualising, with recurrence, evolution, and innovation arising naturally from the system’s topology.
4. Innovation and adaptation
Novelty occurs through perturbations in the symbolic field:
-
New metaphors, narrative forms, or linguistic expressions are perspectival cuts into the system.
-
Successful innovations align with the field, becoming integrated and stabilising new patterns of potential.
-
Stability and innovation coexist as complementary expressions of reflexive alignment.
5. Implications
-
Symbolic systems are morphogenetic, shaping and being shaped by collective construal.
-
Recurrence, stability, and evolution arise from topological persistence, not linear transmission.
-
This perspective unifies language, myth, and culture under the principle of reflexive alignment, providing a relational understanding of symbolic continuity and change.
In the next post, “Emergence and Innovation: Perturbing the Field,” we will explore how novelty, conflict, and creativity function in social and symbolic morphogenesis—showing how systems adapt and evolve while maintaining coherence.
No comments:
Post a Comment