Having articulated the grammar of potential — the operations of phase, alignment, constraint, reflexivity, valence, and actualisation — we can now examine how these operations produce structured, recognisable, and interpretable forms. This is the domain of morphology: the emergence of semiotic patterns that make relational potential intelligible.
Emergent Patterning
Patterns arise when co-conditioned potentials stabilise through repeated co-realisation. Phase synchrony, alignment, and high-valence configurations generate recurrent semiotic motifs: distinguishable forms within the relational field. These motifs are the building blocks of morphological structure.
Functional Differentiation
As patterns emerge, potentials adopt differentiated roles within the field. Some realisations act as anchors, providing coherence; others provide contrast, enabling novelty; still others mediate between patterns, producing continuity across phase and alignment shifts.
This functional differentiation is relational and systemic: potentials acquire significance not intrinsically, but in relation to other realisations. Morphology is therefore the mapping of potential onto patterned, differentiated roles that sustain intelligibility.
Stability and Variability
Morphological patterns are recognisable because they combine stability and variability. Stable configurations enable recognition and predictability, while relational variation ensures the system can adapt to new interactions. The balance between repetition and modulation produces semiotic forms that are both coherent and flexible.
From Grammar to Morphology
Where the grammar of potential described how the field operates, morphology describes how the outcomes of those operations are structured into intelligible forms. Phase, alignment, constraint, reflexivity, and valence do not vanish once patterns emerge; they continue to modulate and shape the semiotic realisations that constitute morphology.
In the next post, Semiotic Units and System Realisation — The Atoms of Meaning, we will explore the granularity of morphological patterns, examining how system options are realised as minimal semiotic units that carry interpretable potential across the field.
No comments:
Post a Comment