Contemporary approaches increasingly view consciousness as a complex, emergent phenomenon, arising from interactions among neural, cognitive, social, and symbolic systems. Potential is structured not linearly, but through nonlinear dynamics, feedback loops, and adaptive constraints, producing fields of possibility that are contingent, flexible, and historically situated.
Emergence implies that higher-order patterns of awareness cannot be reduced to isolated components; relational interactions at multiple scales produce novel modes of perception, thought, and action. Reflexivity becomes a property of the system: awareness of self, other, and environment co-evolves with the constraints and affordances shaping the relational field. Possibility is thus distributed and co-constituted, contingent on both internal structure and external engagement.
Complexity science highlights sensitive dependence and adaptive capacity. Small perturbations in the network of perception, memory, and intention can generate qualitatively new forms of awareness, revealing how conscious potential is historically and contextually mediated. Feedback mechanisms ensure continuous adaptation: consciousness is both shaped by and shaping the relational conditions under which it operates.
Through this lens, consciousness is ontologically relational: its horizons of potential are inseparable from the dynamic networks of which it is part. Reflexive awareness is enacted in a field of interactions, where each act of perception, thought, or choice is both enabled and constrained by the evolving structure of the system. Possibility is never fixed; it is continuously negotiated, modulated, and realised within relational contexts.
Modulatory voices: Francisco Varela, Stuart Kauffman, Humberto Maturana, Ilya Prigogine.
Modulatory Insert: Gerald Edelman and Neural Darwinism
Gerald Edelman’s Neural Darwinism provides a selectionist account of brain dynamics, emphasising how neural populations compete, adapt, and stabilise through experience. In relational terms, this offers a concrete mechanism for how possibility is filtered, constrained, and actualised within the neural field.
Possibility is not a pre-given map but a dynamic, relational landscape: neural circuits interact with sensory, motor, and symbolic inputs, shaping which potentials emerge and which remain dormant. This mirrors the broader series’ emphasis on co-constitution and feedback, showing how the biological substrate of consciousness participates actively in structuring potential.
Edelman’s insights also reinforce the integration of embodied, cognitive, and symbolic layers: the brain is simultaneously responsive to immediate interactions and oriented toward historically and culturally mediated patterns. Reflexivity is built into the system: experiences shape neural connectivity, which in turn shapes future experiences, producing a self-modulating field of relational possibility.
Modulatory voice: Gerald Edelman – bridging biology, cognition, and relational emergence.
No comments:
Post a Comment