Sunday, 5 October 2025

Genealogies of Relational Ontologies in Philosophy: 1 Heraclitus and Flux – Becoming as Relation

Heraclitus inaugurates a philosophical lineage that foregrounds relationality as the ground of being. For him, reality is not a collection of static substances but an ongoing process: everything flows (panta rhei), and becoming is the primary mode through which potential is actualised. Stability is an abstraction; relations between changing elements constitute the true fabric of existence.

In this framework, possibility is inseparable from the relational field in which it manifests. Opposites are not merely juxtaposed; they define and actualise one another. Fire, as the archetypal element, embodies transformation and the continuous interplay of forces, illustrating how being emerges through tension, correspondence, and interdependence.

Heraclitus’ thought reframes construal itself. To understand the world is to apprehend the network of relations that condition what can occur. Knowledge is perspectival and dynamic, grasped through attunement to the patterns and flows that generate potential. Becoming, in this sense, is not a property of things but a relational process that structures the horizon of possibility.

This early articulation of relational potential establishes the core insight for the genealogy of relational ontologies: that being, knowledge, and possibility are always co-constituted within the flux of interdependent relations. Heraclitus’ vision of the world as dynamic, relational, and processual sets the stage for subsequent philosophical explorations of how potential and actualisation are structured through relation rather than substance.

No comments:

Post a Comment