1. Introduction: Mass in Quantum Context
This post extends the relational ontology of mass into the quantum domain, showing that “quantum mass” emerges naturally from pattern stability, without invoking particles as carriers.
2. Relational Amplitude Structures
At the quantum scale, systems are described by amplitude patterns:
-
Amplitudes represent relational potential for cuts, not probabilities of intrinsic states.
-
Superpositions are overlapping potentialities, not ontologically distinct worlds.
-
Coherence across amplitudes is the quantum analogue of pattern stability in classical horizons.
Mass, in this context, is the depth and resilience of amplitude patterns across successive relational cuts:
-
Deep, coherent amplitude structures resist perturbation → appear “massive”
-
Shallow or null amplitude structures → appear “massless”
No field or particle is needed; only the relational topology of potentiality amplitudes.
3. Higgs Field Reinterpreted
The standard model’s Higgs mechanism is often portrayed as a “field giving mass to particles.” Relationally:
-
The Higgs is not a field imparting intrinsic properties,
-
but a pattern-coupling constraint in potentiality that stabilises relational amplitudes.
-
Quantum mass emerges as the relational depth of these coupled amplitude structures, observable only through the resulting stable patterns.
Thus what conventional physics calls “interaction with the Higgs field” is actually the relational actualisation of deeper amplitude coherence.
4. Massless vs Massive in Quantum Terms
The distinction mirrors the classical relational distinction:
-
Massless quantum patterns = shallow amplitude structures, unconstraining, traverse null-horizons
-
Massive quantum patterns = deep, coupled amplitudes, generate local curvature in relational horizons
The quantum ontology thereby mirrors the classical pattern:
-
depth of potential → “mass”
-
horizon curvature → inertial/gravitational response
-
stability of amplitude → observed quantum behaviour
5. Implications for Quantum-Relational Mechanics
-
Particle concepts are optional; relational amplitude patterns suffice to explain mass-related phenomena.
-
Quantum dynamics are sequences of relational cuts constrained by amplitude structure, not movements of intrinsic particles.
-
Quantum mass is therefore a macroscopic manifestation of relational coherence at the amplitude level.
This provides a unified explanation for why certain quanta behave as if “massive” and others as if “massless,” without invoking metaphysical carriers.
6. Connecting to Classical Relational Mass
Classical and quantum mass converge naturally:
-
Classical mass = stability of relational horizon across cuts
-
Quantum mass = stability of relational amplitude structures
-
Both are measures of the depth of potentiality, differing only in scale and mode of manifestation
This confirms that mass is fundamentally relational, not particulate, and that the classical limit arises smoothly from quantum relational amplitude structures.
7. Summary and Transition
Quantum mass emerges as stability of relational amplitude structures, not as a property of particles.
-
Massless quantum patterns → minimal amplitude depth → follow null geodesics
-
Massive quantum patterns → deep amplitude coherence → modulate horizons and influence classical trajectories
The final post, Post 8 — The Relational Origin of Gravity Waves, will show how dynamic curvature in these relational horizons produces phenomena conventionally called gravitational waves, completing the series’ relational reconstruction of mass, inertia, gravitation, and quantum mass.
No comments:
Post a Comment