If instantiation is the cut that opens potential, individuation is the system folding back on itself to stabilise that cut as a recognisable phenomenon. Whereas instantiation makes something possible, individuation makes something this — giving identity, coherence, and persistence to the emergent form.
Individuation is reflexive: the system interprets its own instantiation, constraining and integrating it within the broader relational field. In this sense, every individuated phenomenon is both an instance and a self-construal, a relational node in which potential and actuality coalesce.
Illustrations across our morphogenesis trilogy make this vivid:
-
Cells: Tissue differentiation becomes stable patterns only when the cells’ positions, signals, and interactions are construed collectively — boundaries and functional roles emerge as individuated relational forms.
-
Superorganisms: The behaviours of castes or individuals achieve meaning when interpreted within the colony’s semiotic field; a forager is not simply an agent, but a defined node in the colony’s distributed organisation.
-
Language: Words, gestures, and registers only function when they are interpreted and integrated within the communal semiotic field, producing recognisable messages and shared meaning.
The interplay is crucial: instantiation without individuation is unrealised potential; individuation without instantiation is abstract and inert. Morphogenesis depends on their continuous coupling — a relational engine in which every emergent form is both cut and construal, potential and actuality, field and node.
Understanding individuation as reflexive construal allows us to see how stability, coherence, and identity emerge across scales, from cells to colonies to symbolic systems. It is the lens through which we can finally appreciate morphogenesis not merely as change, but as the actualisation of relational potential in concrete, perceivable form.
No comments:
Post a Comment